The decline into worldwide economic depression in 1929 elicited a different kind of film. Hollywood was predominantly producing golden-age escapist films, such as the classic Ginger Draper and Fred Astaire musicals. However, not all audiences wanted to be distracted by the glitz and glam of fabricated sets. Many were creating films based in the difficult realities of the day. Documentary filmmaking lent itself particularly well to recording and bringing to light the specific issues of the time period. Filmmakers such as John Grierson, were particularly influential in creating a new trend in the documentary tradition. He sought the “drama of the doorstep” to help “lead the citizen through the wilderness”. His film Drifters(1929) became an important catalyst in motivating others to take up the camera as an advocate for the actual and relevant world issues. They would find the stories that were "right under their noses" to unveil truth happening.
Housing Problems (Grierson 1935). This film, like many of Grierson's films, advocated for the improvement of a certain social issue.
While Grierson and others sought to advocate positive social change though film, others were using documentary to solicit change as well, but by conforming their viewers to a specific ideal. For example, in Germany at the same time, Hitler was consolidating his power and was seeking to disseminate Nazi ideas to the people. He also turned to film as a powerful tool in advocating a cause. He was particularly fond of one specific filmmaker, Leni Riefenstahl, who had had a fairly successful career as an actor turned director. He asked her to film a grandiose political demonstration in 1935. This would become the chilling propaganda piece called Triumph des Willens (Triumph of Wills). This film and many others produced by the Ministry of Propaganda would play an important role in cultivating Nazi ideals and antisemitic sentiments. Documentary was quickly becoming a powerful tool in advocating for any cause, whether judged as right or wrong by the viewer.
Triumph of Wills (Riefenstahl 1935). Although lauded for its technical innovation and effectiveness, this film became a dark mark on Riefenstahl’s career permanently associating her with one of the most horrific events of history.
Today, documentary is still commonly used to call attention to specific social issues or advocate for change. One such example is Alive Inside (Rossato-Bennett 2014), a moving piece about music therapy with dementia and Alzheimer’s patients. Micheal Rossato-Bennett works with Dan Cohen to introduce music and the miracles it works into as many nursing homes as possible. Their story is beautiful, heartfelt, and extremely motivating. It is difficult to come away without having cried a little (or a lot) and thinking about our own elderly loved ones. Through Rossato-Bennett and Cohen’s efforts, individual iPods and personalized playlists have been gifted to hundreds of elders throughout the US, and they hope to keep going. This film particularly shows the power of documentary in inspiring change.
Return to Homs is a poignant and personal depiction of the Syrian conflict and civil war. Its main character is the renowned goalkeeper for the national soccer team, Abdul Basset Saroot. The film follows him from the beginning of the peaceful protests as he performs rallying songs to the breakout of civil war and his audacious leadership of a small band of rebels. He is charismatic and relatable, giving emotional and intimate insight into the war-torn area. Slingshot Hip Hop is another stirring documentary that gives the viewers an insight into a political conflict, especially from a perspective uncommonly envisioned. The story deals with the birth of rap in Israeli occupied Palestinian communities. Two main groups, DAM and PR, give us a personal view of the precarious situation of Palestinians in sector ’48, Gaza, and the West Bank. The two groups (and others) use rap as a peaceful form of vocalizing their struggles and discontent, as well as rallying and infor...
The expository mode of documentary "assembles fragments of the historical world into a more rhetorical or narrative frame than an aesthetic or poetic one," (Nichols). It employs indexical images, poetic and affective associations, storytelling qualities, and rhetorical persuasiveness. These types of documentaries rely heavily on spoken dialogue to inform the audience. Editing focuses on the gathering of evidence or creating the greatest impact, therefore often spatial or temporal continuity is altered. On the other hand, observational mode seeks to have as limited involvement in the events as possible. The idea is that the filmmaker sets up the camera and lets fate tell the story. Both modes were enabled by advances in camera and sound technologies in the 1960’s. Equipment became lighter, less obtrusive and easier to transport. It allowed more freedom of movement therefore leading to less strict control over staging, arrangement, or composition, and in the expository documen...
Enabled by the technological advancements of the 1960s, the participatory mode of documentary formed. It is nearly opposite of the observational documentary with the filmmaker directly interacting with the subject, conversing, collaborating, and sometimes confronting. The audience also is able to interact more with the subject. These films draw from an anthropological tradition but differ in their dedication to the rhetoric of a story rather than simply the social science research. Documentary tends to not sacrifice the narrative for the data. Often in participatory mode however, the narrative doesn’t occur until the filmmaker incites the story; potentially one they are already involved with, or perhaps one that they seek out to investigate. The participatory mode can be exemplified by Ross McElwee’s documentary, Time Indefinite and Jean Rouch’s Chronicle of a Summer . The story in both films would not have occurred if the filmmakers had not picked up their ...
Comments
Post a Comment